Alex.Jones.Show.2008.10.15-chakra71

Wednesday October 15, 2008. Today, Alex talks with Peter Joseph, producer of the documentary Zeitgeist, about the film's controversial Addendum. http://prisonplanet.com http://prisonplanet.tv http://truthnews.us http://arnoldexposed.com http://jonesreport.com http://infowars.net

udp://tracker.openbittorrent.com:80
udp://open.demonii.com:1337
udp://tracker.coppersurfer.tk:6969
udp://exodus.desync.com:6969

 chakra71 (2008-10-16)

sorry for the delay... there were amazing issues with the live stream... had to grab the podcast because the re-broadcast was screwed up too!
i must say... alex was a total ASS in the interview with peter joseph.

GunnyXray (2008-10-16)

Hey Chakra its Gunny!
They banned me from the prisonplanet forum for saying Jenny McCarthy was a softcore pornstar.
Alex was a total ass today

InfoWarmonger (2008-10-16)

Alex does have terrible interview skills and he treats his callers like $h!t.

icanseeu (2008-10-16)

Thanks chakra!
I do know Alex can be an ass sometimes.

GunnyXray (2008-10-16)

Alex is a redneck, but he has the most entertaining radio show out there!

GunnyXray (2008-10-16)

Sane banned me... hes in love with Jenny McCarthy or something. I was one of the top posters on the prison planet forum. There was no way I was going to let the "Jenny McCarthy is great" post go without pointing out she was a softcore pornstar. She was the Amy Winehouse of the 1990s.

duhprane (2008-10-16)

yaketty yak shut yer crack....

 CaptOmerta (2008-10-16)

Judaism, Christianity and Islam are sometimes referred to as the "Abrahamic religions", because of the progenitor role Abraham plays in their holy books. In the Jewish tradition, he is called Avraham Avinu or "Abraham, our Father". God promised Abraham that through his offspring, all the nations of the world will come to be blessed (Genesis 12:3), interpreted in Christian tradition as a reference particularly to Christ. Jews, Christians, and Muslims consider him father of the people of Israel through his son Isaac (cf. Exodus 6:3, Exodus 32:13). For Muslims, he is a prophet of Islam and the ancestor of Muhammad through his other son Ishmael - born to him by his wife's servant, Hagar. Abraham is also a progenitor of the Semitic tribes of the Negev who trace their descent from their common ancestor Sheba (Genesis 10:28).
Jacob was the son of Isaac, the twin brother of Esau, and grandson of Abraham.
The "Royal Family", of England (who we all speak the language of) truly believes they are the direct descendants of Jacob...hence the "Coronation Stone"..ie Jacob's Stone, where we slept and had his vision, Jacob's ladder.
Both Jewish and Islamic traditions consider Ishmael as the ancestor of Northern Arab people.[1]
Judaism has generally viewed Ishmael as wicked though repentant.[1] Judaism maintains that Isaac (the father of the Jewish people) rather than Ishmael was the true heir of Abraham.[3] The New Testament contains few references to Ishmael. In Christian biblical interpretation, Ishmael is used to symbolize the older?now rejected?Judaic tradition; Isaac symbolizes the new tradition of Christianity.[1] Islamic tradition, however, has a very positive view of Ishmael, giving him a larger and more significant role. The Qur'an views him as a prophet, and as the actual son that Abraham was called on to sacrifice, as opposed to Isaac.
Even if you don't believe this, THEY DO.
This is the basis of all the conflict, and the reason Bush(who is related to THE ROYAL FAMILY) the first one, set up a beachhead in Kuwait, in preparation for his son to use Isreal...I mean the Royal Families...oopps..I mean American troops as the scape goat for the world to say, "those Americans always starting wars". This helps to turn world opinion against our freedoms, as we are the LAST HOPE for the rebellion!

level1online (2008-10-16)

WOW! I just finished listening the third hour... I totally was not expecting this interview to go the way it did....
ok, listening to the forth hour now:
Alex asks: So why do you use the scary music too?
Mr. Zeitgeist responds: "There's a very big difference, because one is pure marketing and the other is art."
Wow, put my hand over my face for that humongous FAIL!

icanseeu (2008-10-16)

Wow I'm listening to the 4th hour now and I must say it is very entertaining. I love when Alex goes off it's pretty funny.

 chakra71 (2008-10-16)

interesting post on infowars on zeitgeist addendum
http://www.infowars dot com/?p=5336
i just scanned it... i'll get around to reading tomorrow at work ::wink::

truthandhope (2008-10-16)

Thanks again for your hard work Chakra! I listened to this live last night and with all the skips and cut offs thought, too, that Alex was being over the top. However, after listening again to your upload, now think Alex was very on point with this bloke. Think like Icke that it's very suspicious that Addendum was released at this time. We will never achieve utopia (even Atlantis was sunk!). There will always be a self serving elite (innate or conditioned behaviour?) who feel its their divine right to rule under ANY system. Globalisation under any guise is EVIL and only maintains the slave culture we have suffered over the centuries.
The world should donate a piece of land to these self appointed rulers, fence them in and let them live the future they envision. This will leave the rest of humanity to live out our lives in harmony and peace with our environment, uncorrupted by their occultist death and destruction form of tyranny.

 chakra71 (2008-10-16)

I certainly don't agree with the conclusions in zeitgeist addendum (or with all of them in the 1st one), but it just ticked me off that Alex acted like a 2 year old during this interview.
How many times did he go "NYA-AH-AH-AH!" to get Peter to stop talking long enough to drive the conversation into a completely different direction.
For the most part I think Alex does a great job, but occasionally he gets SO worked up into a frenzy that he makes a complete ass out of himself.
I have no watched the Addendum yet, so I can't really comment on the views in the movie, but I will say that the point that Peter was trying to make in this interview is one I've had for a while. Even if we throw off this current version of the NWO and go back to our 'constitutional' government derived from Natural Law then new tyrants will emerge and try the game over again.
My solution to that problem is not the same as what Peter has suggested on the show (yet, my knowledge is limited by not having seen the film). My solution is to continue to destroy governments which are the force behind the corruption and to INFORM the masses and ARM a majority of the population so that we can keep the government or the evil (bad, destructive, greedy) people that do form under a free market system.
The problem we have today is that we have this partially free market system that on the surface looks free, but in reality, is controlled by the bad factions through government edict. This allows the greed to sustain when in a system without governmental protection they would be taken down. Case and point... the 'bailout' and subsequent laws are protecting and even rewarding the greed of the last 20 (more heavily in the last 5-10) years. And even that greed was able to prosper because of the LAWS passed by GOVERNMENT paid for by GREEDY PEOPLE/CORPORATIONS.
If we had no laws other than Natural Law (property rights) to protect anyone then this nonsense would have stopped long ago.

american_tradition (2008-10-17)

Wow I havn't heard Alex treat a guest like this before. When AJ felt insulted by Peter making the remark about the $29.95 "free-market" tactics that he said alex and he were doing alex went overboard. I'm sorry but you were not being humble alex you were being proud. That is why you attacked him multiple times. I hope AJ apolizes to Peter for his remarks in some way.
Personally I totally disagree with Peter. The only time we will have a utopian society is when Christ comes back to rule as king of kings. Anyways thats what I believe. Also these Utopian ideals don't take into account agency and free thought. Also property rights. Uh I have this idea to build this awesome invention but I need your land. No you can't have this land I'm already started on this scientific project. Oh, well in that case I shall use my phaser and fry your inferior @$$ so I can do my project. I am sorry but people always seem to do different to there upbringing. Why do we have killers in a non-killer society? Why do we have unselfish people and non-drinkers and non-conformists and free-thinkers in any society? Oh yeah because we can think for ourselves. We are not 100% conditioned. We are forced to make decisions in what to believe in. That is why opposites are all around us; Anarchy and Totalitarianism and Constitutional Republics alike! Its so funny because the evolutionary theory strives on competition so if you believe in evolution you essentially believe in survival of the fittest! You cannot have it both ways! There is no evil there is only abhorrent behavior? Well according to evolution maybe killers should dominate. I do not understand why evolutionists respect other peoples rights in that sense. Do we have rights if we are all here with no purpose but to be the best and survive the longest through posterity? I understand my leanings are bias but hey everyone is!
Anywho Alex you have embarrassed yourself and brought some shame to the movement but I forgive you because all men succumb to appetites and emotions in times of weakness and I know that you really want good to happen.

InfoWarmonger (2008-10-17)

I thought Alex was justified to call out Peter Joseph on his bullshit. That guy doesn't even think humans have instincts, he thinks its all conditioning. He thinks child molesters aren't evil, that society has conditioned them to rape children.

 {-Rise-of-the-Truth-} (2008-10-21)

I agree that Alex can be a total ass sometimes.
He's a great guy, and he's correct about 99% of everything he talks about, but he has some false beliefs that he just CAN NOT let go of, and he's ready to defend them to death... it's pretty sad, since it's holding him back a lot.