Exposed - Climate of Fear

The truth is, I?m really not a science guy. I mean, I?m interested in it but I?m not some ?climate change? groupie who watches the Weather Channel for fun?it?s not my pet project and I don?t talk about it over dinner with friends. But here?s what I am passionate about?getting at the truth?peeling away the layers of hypocrisy and letting the best information available inform, educate and enlighten me. And on the issue of global warming, that hasn?t been happening. On my TV show, I?ve been telling people to watch this special because ?there are two sides to every debate.? Now that I think about it, that?s a lie. The truth is, there are at least two sides to every debate?probably as many sides and points of view as there are informed, articulate people engaged in the debate. It?s a big world out there and even the simple, everyday things are complicated, let alone incredibly complex, nuanced areas of science and climatology that lie at the heart of the global warming issue. For too long, Al Gore and his film have been preaching one way of thinking about this issue and if you don?t agree, you?re classified as someone who can?t face up to the ?truth?? cast aside as an evil enemy of the Earth?no better than a Holocaust denier. That?s exactly what inspired me to get involved in this issue?when science and those who study it refuse to face a challenge to their findings, they abandon rational thought and wrap themselves in tunnel-visioned dogma. Not only is that intellectually dishonest, but it?s anti-science and anti-American. An acceptance and encouragement of diversity of thought is at the very foundation of the way we live. I would have hoped that a guy like Al, you know, who used to want to be president (and probably will want to again) would know that. So I hope you watch the show and make up your own mind?I don?t want you to blindly agree with me any more than Al Gore or anybody else. Issues affecting our planet are a big deal. But thinking for yourself and not letting anyone?no matter how white their lab coat?scare you into believing them is just as big.

udp://tracker.openbittorrent.com:80
udp://open.demonii.com:1337
udp://tracker.coppersurfer.tk:6969
udp://exodus.desync.com:6969

littlejungle (2007-07-07)

Would it really be so bad if the whole climate change phenomenum was incorrect. We live completely unsustainably, we literally rape and plunder what is not ours to do so....If living in a more environmentally conscious world was the consequence of some misinformation... That'd be diabolical!! You sound like the kind of middle class card board cut-out that just doesn't get it! Your life is surely cut out of a block of cheese!!

n3wby (2007-07-14)

Thanks for making this available.
The audio is a bit out of sync. It would be great if someone could fix that.

oldngrey (2007-10-18)

The Big Myth! Global warming.
The film "An Incovenient Truth" would make a great presentation if it would tell you the truth about global warming , it's quick flashing scenes and ill begotten music gave me a sense of forbodding and doesn't not help to convey a sense of workable energy alternatives, this film made me feel helpless and depressed. Much of the film is with Al Gore without anyone really backing up his views , it is like a big ego trip.My conclusion is if you want a pure disaster horror film then this is the one for you, but if you want a unbiased view of global temperature change then look to the bbc horizion documentary about global climate change. the nobel prize has lost all of its meaning and prestige since Al Gore got his. If anyone believes that humans causes global warming is either ignorant or having an agenda. Al Gore does have an agenda, look at his new company which buys and sells carbon credits, instant money for nothing.The "Greener" religion just doesn't standup to Scientific facts. Al Gore would sell his mother for a little feel good publicity. Alfred Nobel is probably rolling in his grave over what the Nobel prize become. The Nobel Peace Prize had lost it prestige long ago when it was given to Arafat, the father of modern terrorism.
The nine alleged errors in the film
# Mr Gore claims that a sea-level rise of up to 20 feet would be caused by melting of either West Antarctica or Greenland "in the near future". The judge said: "This is distinctly alarmist and part of Mr Gore's "wake-up call". He agreed that if Greenland melted it would release this amount of water - "but only after, and over, millennia"."The Armageddon scenario he predicts, insofar as it suggests that sea level rises of seven metres might occur in the immediate future, is not in line with the scientific consensus."
# The film claims that low-lying inhabited Pacific atolls "are being inundated because of anthropogenic global warming" but the judge ruled there was no evidence of any evacuation having yet happened.
# The documentary speaks of global warming "shutting down the Ocean Conveyor" - the process by which the Gulf Stream is carried over the North Atlantic to western Europe. Citing the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the judge said that it was "very unlikely" that the Ocean Conveyor, also known as the Meridional Overturning Circulation, would shut down in the future, though it might slow down.
# Mr Gore claims that two graphs, one plotting a rise in C02 and the other the rise in temperature over a period of 650,000 years, showed "an exact fit". The judge said that, although there was general scientific agreement that there was a connection, "the two graphs do not establish what Mr Gore asserts".
# Mr Gore says the disappearance of snow on Mt Kilimanjaro was directly attributable to global warming, but the judge ruled that it scientists have not established that the recession of snow on Mt Kilimanjaro is primarily attributable to human-induced climate change.
# The film contends that the drying up of Lake Chad is a prime example of a catastrophic result of global warming but the judge said there was insufficient evidence, and that "it is apparently considered to be far more likely to result from other factors, such as population increase and over-grazing, and regional climate variability."
# Mr Gore blames Hurricane Katrina and the consequent devastation in New Orleans on global warming, but the judge ruled there was "insufficient evidence to show that".
# Mr Gore cites a scientific study that shows, for the first time, that polar bears were being found after drowning from "swimming long distances - up to 60 miles - to find the ice" The judge said: "The only scientific study that either side before me can find is one which indicates that four polar bears have recently been found drowned because of a storm."That was not to say there might not in future be drowning-related deaths of bears if the trend of regression of pack ice continued - "but it plainly does not su

grooverf (2008-01-18)

90% of the worlds scientists agree it's
happening and we are responsible.
Check out IPCC (International Panel on Climate
Change) for the truth.

mtngirl_1013 (2008-04-26)

The global warming movement is about three things~ taxing you to death, regulating everything about your life, and ultimately, to get you to go along with population culling. There are real problems and real solutions but Al Gore and IPCC are not talking about them.
"In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill ... All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself."
? in The First Global Revolution, pp.104-105 by Alexander King, founder of the Club of Rome and Bertrand Schneider, secretary of the Club of Rome
Remember just a few decades ago when everyone was all in hysterics about a coming ice age?
Lots of the same hysterical rhetoric we see now with "global warming".
Time Magazine 6-24-74 "Another Ice Age?"

redox1 (2009-09-04)

@grooverf
Do you think the IPCC, a UN created and funded organisation is going to say anything that jepardises the creation of the "Emissions Trading Scheme"?
It is nothing more than first global tax to fund the UN world government. And who ends up paying for it: the consumer. Our own government estimates the cost of food will go up 9% after the ETS is enacted.
ETS = World Government gets more power & general population gets poorer